Saturday, April 19, 2008

"Who Are You, Anyway?"

I've been trying to post this throughout the week; unfortunately, my connection is finally, rather than just being a pain, moving into the "semi-usable" category, and I haven't been vigilant enough to make it work right up to now.

Anyway, I said I would post my written work for the Artistic Spectrum event. Here it is, titled "Who Are You, Anyway?"

Quick Note: This actually is the first draft, rather than the final product I ended up reading. But it changed very little, so you're essentially reading the same thing with typos.
_______________________________________________________________

They call me autistic. Perhaps you’re said to be normal, or it’s quite possible you’re called autistic, too, or similarly Asperger’s. Perhaps you’re titled ADHD, maybe dyslexic. Who knows? There are many words, often considered with little personal meaning.

Perhaps I shouldn’t care. After all, in the wrong company, they mean nothing beyond the surface, no more or less trivial than the food you eat and the car you drive. Poorly defined terms themselves, sometimes it seems that they just create more confusion, rather than help clarify as such terms should do. After all, isn’t that what words do?

Yet, I do care. For those the terms themselves a far cry from crystal clear, they provide another way to speak about ourselves, a different way to represent internal experience in a way. Indeed, it’s the very reason for language, else there would nothing that would be worth talking about. And yet that clearly isn’t true, is it? It seems obvious enough, just by the nature of questions themselves. Maybe they’re of minute, practical nature, perhaps questions of life experience, and several others far and in between. My favorite ones are the ones that truly ask about those they question because, despite my oft-reclusive behavior, I’d like to know you.

It’s a Saturday night, and I’ve had something of a long day. Tired, this time much a personal blessing, I go not to my bed, in a all of its perfect color and location, but to the upstairs couch, where I squish in between the cushions. As the brown and black fabric became more tightly pressed to my skin, I feel my body relax, allow many thoughts to slip away into the night.

What would you have felt?
A warm, friendly light floods a desert canyon, reflecting off of yellow sand in its brightness. I skirt and jump around many rocks and bushes, as if they didn’t exist, stepping quickly back onto the dirt road to avoid a boulder. Suddenly, a coming monstrosity shoots into my head, raking its claws down my skull. Only though sheet force of will do I step off the road, in time to avoid getting hit by a tractor.

What might have you heard instead?
I look at the vast array of images, exhibited individually, proud, bordering on pompous, on its own. Each image seems to be collected of various colors, shapes, and scenes, none of which are unique on their own; quite the opposite, they’re things that you would regularly see walking down the street. I fail to honestly differentiate it from the world I generally live in, aside from their placement.

Did you see something else?
It’s snowing outside, and I quietly leave my tiny room, wearing a black jacket and a pair of boots. The snowflakes are indeed pretty, but it is the memories they elicit that is truly wondrous, taking me back to when I was seven, when I enjoyed the sensation of the snowstorm without a jacket, to when I was ten, entrenched in a particularly intense snowball fight, and then to when I was thirteen, moving way too fast down a sledding hill and loving it. All of this happens in three seconds and yet so many more, all at the same time.

Where do the snowflakes take you?

I indulge in yet another Pad Thai noodle. The taste is intimately scarlet; that is, it carries a sense of mental discovery, excitement, and wonder. It isn’t the first such noodle I have, nor will it be the last, but the feeling stays strong. I smile, and prepare to eat another.

What, for you, is tied to such feelings?

Yawning, I reach over for my root beer, and look back at my computer screen. I’m writing yet again. This time I’m writing satire, basically in regards to some of the notions of intelligence and marginalization of others based on some of those definitions. I’m a little worried, though, as is usual when I’m writing satire. It’s more subtle than most satires, in such a way that the actual meaning of the piece might be missed, I think. And it’s quite possible that, considering where I am, that its actual meaning may not be well received, though perhaps this makes it all the better. Swallowing all of my objections, I write the piece anyway, just because I love the idea, and I think it is an important topic.

What might have you been thinking?

Alas, I will never know exactly what you are thinking. I can approximate using language, but those actual experiences will never be known to me, nor mine to you, even if I actually develop my writing skills more significantly. Perhaps this is a good thing, in the end; after all, coming fully to terms with contrary and differing senses of the same thing might be a maddening experience indeed. But I can’t help but wish that maybe I would really, truly, see through the eyes of another.

Since that isn’t likely to happen, it is still worthy, in my mind, to still ask questions, to observe, in order to try and understand that better. Language, though highly imperfect, and all the more so when in my hands, is essentially designed to help with that, to bring together two thoughts into the same realm. Perhaps I am being optimistic (I must be biased in this regard, having put so many hours into learning the stuff), but I think it helps a lot in remembering something of someone else.

So, who are you, anyway?

7 comments:

Laura said...

*applause*

Well I'll dive in.

You invite me, the reader, to share my experiences and impressions. But I'm not going to be able to provide you with any insight as to neurotypical perception. See, I'm the person who can't remember names and faces. I'm the person that gets from point A to point B by sense of direction, but never by sight. I'm the person who can't remember details. I go to the internet so that my mind can take a little walk even though my body is trapped in a pedestrian experience. I'll take ideality over reality any day. It's not that my perception of the real world is distorted, fragmented or otherwise impaired. I just don't think in concrete terms.

Cliff Schumacher said...

Well, thank you!

Of course, I would like to hear of a perspective that is different. Certainly, the idealist in me says that any experience is worth sharing, and while that may not be entirely true, it is for the most part (I'm sure someone can dream up an exception but I can't think of one!)

Hmm... I kind of like the picture I get already, though. Some of it is familiar, some of it different, what else to expect? But it's certainly it's easy to see value in a kind of more conceptual, if you will, perception of the world. It's more akin to mine than most, I suspect (oh, and I'm awful with names and faces, often!).

P.S.

Same comment as the one I deleted, but without a particularly obnoxious typo. I'm not usually THAT bothered by my typing mistakes, but that one...

Cliff

Laura said...

I was a philosophy major too, once upon a time. The organization and analysis of ideas is a good way to achieve the meeting of the minds between NT and autistic, language or the articulation of those ideas being the medium.

The difference, I would imagine, is in perception. But you don't need perception to organize pure abstract ideas.

But I guess the theme of the post is difference in perception. I come up empty because that's like asking me to describe background noise. I can focus on it, on demand, but that's not representative of the way I take in the world.

Cliff Schumacher said...

I suppose perception in a sensory sense is of course of interest, but I was looking as perception as a whole, including how one thinks of all of that which they perceive. Heck, ways of thinking are probably the most interesting.

Language, I might actually say, is still something that's very much an uneven playing field in terms of how close it is to that perception. It's interesting, even in language the assumptions therein can say alot. In many ways, I think I have the edge in learning about neurotypicals because of the way it is constructed.

Let me give an example. When I was 10 (ish), I remember being read to in my third grade class. In the discussion of the book came up "that voice in your head". I think this was perhaps the most appalling thing I heard all year and probably longer. It was so different to the way my mind worked that I didn't even have a frame to understand it quite, and I doubt I still do totally (it's a little contradictory in that the "voice" is the person but is external to them, though I understand that it's kind of an aspect, typically representing a moral superstructure). Actually, it made me feel bad, because I thought I was an incomplete individual because I didn't have a "voice", even though I thought it was so creepy.

It's those kind of things, you know, that come up, and a good place to start, though no means representative, in talking about the similarities and differences.

Cliff

Laura said...

See, that's fascinating to me. For my part, I think in words. And I talk to myself a lot. My college friends hypothesized that I was talking to an imaginary friend. And they named her Helen. (That's how bad I was.)

Abstract thinking is mostly positive for me. But I do struggle when I'm forced to understand other people sometimes. For my job, I have to sift through a lot of email. I struggle to understand when people who go on and on about details. Flowery prose drives me nuts.

I have yet to read Thinking in Pictures, but I've heard Grandin speak (albeit on youtube). Is Grandin's portrayal accurate? Grandin indicates that she did terrible in algebra because of her inability to think in abstraction. What I've read by way of parenting coping books (hey, I am a parent) indicates that autistics are impaired in symbolic play and symbolic thinking. In my completely novice layperson's subjective opinion, there would appear to be at least a grain of truth to this, at least with respect to aspies.

But when I read your blog, it's very abstract. Grandin also indicates that some autistics think in patterns. What does that mean?

Jason R. said...

Great Posting Cliff. How are you doing this month? Do you have finals coming up for this month?

Anyway, you can email me at jason_s_ross@yahoo.com if you want to.

Today is Asperger's Syndrome Day in New York.

Cliff Schumacher said...

Hello Jason!

Yeah, I have my finals on Monday, and I am extremely busy. But I'm taking a break to write here, finally! I'll even e-mail you today (or tomorrow, it's lurking on me, isn't it!).

That's extremely cool that New York has Asperger's Day. Hmm... does my lovely Nevada have Asperger's Day? I... don't think so. Blah.

Cliff